article · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
One of the strategies for the control and elimination of schistosomiasis is the control of its snail vectors in an endemic area, as is done in other tropical diseases like malaria. However, the strategy currently practiced for the control of the disease in Nigeria is the annual mass administration of preventive chemotherapy (Praziquantel) among school-age children while neglecting the control of its snail intermediate host and other control components. The neglect of malacology and vector control will slow the elimination targets and timeline of 2030 set by the WHO. In this study, we investigated the abundance and seasonal variations in the snail vectors of schistosomiasis and the relationship between the disease among humans and infected snail vectors. A total of 21,282 snails were collected from 13 sites across the six area councils of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). Of the collected snails, 1451 (6.8%) belong to three species: <i>Biomphelaria pfeifferi</i> (0.5%), <i>Bulinus truncatus</i> (2.1%) and <i>Bulinus globosus</i> (4.2%), which are known to be vectors of <i>Schistosoma mansoni</i>, <i>Schistosoma haematobium</i> and <i>Schistosoma bovis</i>, respectively. These three species were all shedding cercariae both at the time of collection and afterwards, when they were induced to shed cercariae. The association between the reported prevalence of the disease and the percentage of snails shedding cercaria were heterogenous across different communities. While Takushara, with a disease prevalence of 46%, had 60% of the cercaria shedding snails, Kwaita sabo pukafa and Guduji, with disease prevalences of 56% and 26% respectively, had no cercaria shedding snails. Similarly, Dagiri rafin shahu and Gwako 1, with disease prevalences of 60% and 38%, had cercaria shedding snails of less than 1%. Nonetheless, the presence of <i>Bulinus</i> and <i>Biomphelaria</i> species in these communities indicates a potential risk of infection for humans and other animals who may come in contact with the water. Consequently, integrated multisectoral control and elimination measures that combine malacological monitoring with behavioral, environmental, and historical epidemiological assessments with a deliberate health orientation of the people through sensitization and health education is advocated to reduce exposure to the disease risk factors and contribute towards elimination of the disease.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph23030384
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.