MARATTO

article · Circulation

Abstract 4371988: Cardiovascular Outcomes of Oral Incretin-Based Therapies in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 62,821 Patients

Abstract

Background: While injectable GLP-1 receptor agonists like semaglutide have demonstrated clear cardiovascular benefits in type 2 diabetes, the role of oral incretin-based therapies, including oral semaglutide and DPP-4 inhibitors—remains less well defined. Comprehensive evaluation of their cardiovascular efficacy is warranted. Research Question: What are the cardiovascular outcomes associated with oral incretin-based therapies, specifically oral semaglutide and DPP-4 inhibitors, in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to placebo or standard care? Methods: We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Meta-analysis was conducted in R version 4.4.3 using the “meta” and “metasens” packages. A restricted maximum likelihood random-effects model with Hartung-Knapp adjustment was used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 11 RCTs comprising 62,821 patients were included, of which two evaluated oral semaglutide and the remaining nine assessed DPP-4 inhibitors. There was no statistically significant difference between oral incretin therapies and control in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.87–1.03), cardiovascular death (RR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.87–1.09), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.67–1.21), non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.76–1.18), unstable angina (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.82–1.20), stroke (RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.83–1.11), hospitalization for heart failure (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.70–1.38), and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.70–1.38). However, oral incretin therapies were associated with a modest but statistically significant reduction in the risk of non-fatal stroke (RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.79–0.99). There were no significant differences in the risk of serious adverse events (RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.87–1.05) or discontinuation due to serious adverse events (RR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.53–2.21). Sensitivity analyses were conducted due to significant heterogeneity in key outcomes. While omitting certain studies reduced heterogeneity, the overall results remained consistent. Conclusion: Oral incretin-based therapies did not significantly impact major cardiovascular outcomes or mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes, but were associated with a modest reduction in non-fatal stroke risk. Further trials should be conducted including oral GLP-1 RAs to establish conclusive evidence.

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4371988

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.