review · Circulation
Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) poses a significant global health burden despite advancements in its management. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, primarily used in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), have gained recent consideration as potential agents for ACS management due to their cardiovascular benefits beyond glycemic control. This study aimed to assess the effects of empagliflozin on left cardiac parameters in ACS patients. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched thoroughly to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until June 1st, 2024. Continuous data were pooled using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using R (Version 4.3). Results: Four RCTs involving 701 patients were included. Compared to placebo, empagliflozin significantly reduced left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) (MD: -2.38, 95% CI: -3.95 to -0.80, p = 0.0032), left ventricular mass index (LVMi) (MD: -2.76, 95% CI: -4.95 to -0.56, p = 0.0137), and left ventricular filling pressure (E/e') (MD: -0.59, 95% CI: -1.07 to -0.10, p = 0.0189). However, empagliflozin treatment did not yield a statistically significant change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD: 1.21, 95% CI: -0.05 to 2.48, p = 0.0603), nor a significant change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) (MD: -4.49, 95% CI: -14.24 to 5.26, p = 0.37), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) (MD: -5.19, 95% CI: -10.77 to 0.39, p = 0.0682), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) (MD: -2.20, 95% CI: -4.59 to 0.19, p = 0.0718). Conclusion: Empagliflozin provides favorable effects on left cardiac structural parameters in ACS patients, as it was associated with reduced LVESVi, LVMi, and E/e'. This suggests a potential role for SGLT2 inhibitors as adjunctive therapy in ACS management, warranting further investigation into their mechanisms and long-term clinical outcomes.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4145162
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.