MARATTO

article · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abiotic pollen loss: The neglected pollen fate

Abstract

Abstract Background Pollen production is a costly investment in angiosperm reproduction, yet only a small fraction of grains reach conspecific stigmas. While pollen loss to floral visitors is well studied, the role of abiotic factors in shaping pollen fate has been largely overlooked. Understanding the relative contributions of biotic and abiotic pollen loss pathways is essential for interpreting floral trait evolution and pollination efficiency. Results We quantified abiotic pollen loss in four animal-pollinated species with contrasting floral longevities and reproductive phase dynamics. Flowers were monitored for five hours after anthesis, with pollen loss compared between unvisited flowers and those receiving single pollinator visits. Across all species, substantial pollen loss occurred in the absence of visitation, ranging from 37–57% of grains. In several cases, losses to legitimate pollinators were indistinguishable from abiotic loss alone, whereas pollen-foraging honeybees removed significantly greater fractions. Conclusion Abiotic factors can account for a large proportion of total pollen loss, sometimes equalling or exceeding pollinator-mediated removal. These findings challenge the assumption that pollen loss is primarily driven by pollinator activity and suggest that floral traits such as closure, gradual pollen release, and pollen packaging may function as adaptations that minimize environmental loss. Incorporating abiotic pollen loss into studies of pollen presentation and pollinator effectiveness provides a more complete understanding of selective pressures shaping floral evolution.

Research topics

  • Plant and animal studies
  • Plant Reproductive Biology
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.64898/2026.03.10.710827

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.