MARATTO

article · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making

A Semi-Systematic Review of the Recent Advances on GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Spatial Suitability

Abstract

Combining multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) with Geographic Information Systems (GISs) provides a substantial framework for spatial suitability analysis, which assesses locations based on environmental, economic, and social criteria. The aim of the study is to highlight the research advances in this field, and to detect the most usable methods in each subject area. We followed a semi-systematic review approach, combining bibliometric analysis of 486 articles with a manual content analysis of a stratified sample of 150 studies. The bibliometric analysis was performed on three major terms: “MCDM”, “Suitability”, and “GIS”, from 2000 to 2024. The obtained results reveal that The Most used method is the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Finally, the study provides field-specific methodological frameworks highlighting the most commonly adopted approaches in the literature to serve as a reference for future studies.

Research topics

  • Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
  • Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Groundwater and Watershed Analysis

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1142/s021962202630003x

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.