article · Journal Of Big Data
Hypothyroidism is a widespread endocrine disorder characterized by vague and non-specific symptoms, making early diagnosis particularly challenging. The increasing availability of large-scale clinical data presents an opportunity to develop robust, data-driven diagnostic systems. However, traditional machine learning approaches often sacrifice interpretability for accuracy, limiting their deployment in clinical settings. In this study, we present DeepSeqNet, a hybrid and interpretable deep learning framework designed for scalable hypothyroidism diagnosis using sequential patient records. Our architecture synergizes convolutional neural networks (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) units, and fully connected (ANN) layers to extract and learn spatial-temporal dependencies in heterogeneous clinical datasets. To ensure transparency, we integrate Polynomial-SHAP, a novel feature attribution method, enabling precise, nonlinear interpretability of model outputs. The framework was evaluated on real-world clinical datasets, achieving 99.34% accuracy, 93.85% precision, 98.39% recall, 96.06% F1-score, and 99.42% specificity on the test set. Performance on the validation set was consistently high, with metrics of 99.59 ± 0.31% accuracy, 99.24 ± 0.42% precision, 99.95 ± 0.04% recall, and 99.59 ± 0.21% F1-score, demonstrating the model’s robustness with minimal performance drop during generalization. Class-wise analysis further shows superior detection of hypothyroidism (F1-score: 96.06%) and normal cases (F1-score: 99.64%). By embedding interpretability into a high-performing deep learning pipeline, our method supports not only accurate prediction but also clinician insight into influential risk factors. While the dataset originates from a single region, the model’s modular design facilitates broad applicability across diverse populations. This study highlights the potential of interpretable AI in improving clinical decision-making for endocrine disorders using big medical data.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1186/s40537-025-01332-1
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.