review · IEEE Access
This survey comprehensively reviews Arabic text summarization, examining state-of-the-art methodologies, commonly used datasets, and evaluation practices. Despite notable progress, the field faces challenges such as fragmented benchmarking, inconsistent metric use, and lacking resources for long-document summarization. We categorize existing summarization methods into traditional, Transformer-based, and hybrid approaches, highlighting their strengths and limitations. We introduce Mukhtasar, a novel dataset supporting short and long summaries across diverse genres to address significant gaps. Additionally, we propose six standardized evaluation splits tailored to distinct summarization goals, promoting reproducibility and fair comparison. To address inconsistencies, we also recommend a consistent reporting protocol using ROUGE-1, ROUGE-2, ROUGE-L, and ROUGE-S. While lexical overlap metrics dominate evaluation practices, we identify the absence of neural-based metrics for Arabic as a significant limitation and call for future development in this area. Our contributions aim to unify evaluation protocols, enrich available resources, and guide the community toward more interpretable and scalable Arabic summarization research.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1109/access.2025.3584855
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.