article · International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research
Infants in rural and remote populations were presented with positive Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) status when parents were healthy (HIV negative). This was a serious concern to clinicians as to how a newborn baby (within 12 months of birth) could be HIV positive when the parents were HIV negative. The infants had no history of any blood transfusion or surgery. With evolving pathogenesis, viral mutagenesis patterns and spreading mediums of viral diseases, this is a serious question to be addressed. Clinicians treating these infants suspect that this is a case of HIV viral mutagenesis. Assumptions about the cause of tongue ties (ankyloglossia) and its effect on families are prevalent in some rural sub-populations. These underlying myths could lead parent(s) to take their infants to surgical treatment (frenectomy) by unlicensed and untrained persons, sometimes referred to as “quack doctors”. The individuals who perform these frenectomies often use unsterilized surgical instruments that have been contaminated in use with HIV positive patients. As a result, there is a need to conduct a need analysis in rural populations to assess the infant HIV magnitude, including the prevalence and incidence rates of HIV in infants. This research project primarily focuses on finding and contrasting the proportion of HIV positive to HIV negative infants with tongue ties. This project also aims to evaluate the perception and knowledge of tongue ties by mothers or caregivers leading them to seek treatment with unlicensed persons, assessing the impacts of tongue ties on infant breastfeeding and speech. Moreover, to determine treatment needs required on infants with underlying oral health problems due to tongue tie. Keywords: Tongue-tie, Infant HIV, Health Promotion, Needs Analysis, Ankyloglossia, Health Protection
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.52403/ijshr.20240447
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.