MARATTO

article · International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics

A novel technique to treat osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures with diaphyseal extension

2025Open accessAlexandria University

Abstract

Background: Recent reports of failure of proximal humeral locked plate (PHILOS) in treating comminnuted proximal humeral fractures (PHF) with diaphyseal extension (DE) prompted attempts to either augment or add more fixation which is challenged with the proximity to important neurovascular structures. Methods: Between February 2020 and May 2024, 29 patients with comminuted fractures of PHF-DE were treated at El-Hadra University Hospital with the addition of either a small locked dynamic compression plate (sLDCP) or a small locked reconstruction plate (sLRP) to the standard PHILOS plate, using the trans-deltoid approach. Results: The average follow-up (FU) period was about 19.5 months. The average age of the patients was approximately 62.6 years. Most of the patients (72.4%) were females. All patients healed their bones without needing additional procedures like bone grafts. The average healing time was just over six months. The mean visual analogue scoring system (VAS) was 8.2. At the end of the FU, there was no significant change in the neck shaft angle (p=0.7). At the end of the FU, the average Constant-Murley shoulder score was noted as 86.6, the mean Simple Shoulder Score was 79.3%, and the average score for the shoulder rating at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) was 31.1. No iatrogenic neurovascular fractures occurred during the study. Conclusions: Performing double plating on PHF-DE is safe. It does not increase the risk of shoulder impingement, harm to the blood supply of the humeral head, or nerve injuries caused by treatment.

Research topics

  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
  • Bone fractures and treatments

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20252448

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.