article · Scientific Reports
Human Activity Recognition (HAR) using wearable sensors is relevant to rehabilitation, assistive robotics, and mobile health applications. This study presents (i) SDALLE, a publicly available multimodal dataset integrating surface electromyography (EMG) and inertial measurement unit (IMU) signals acquired using a DELSYS Trigno wireless system; (ii) a harmonized, subject-dependent comparison with the public ENABL3S dataset; and (iii) an exploratory Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP) augmentation strategy for class balancing. SDALLE contains recordings of nine healthy male subjects walking, jogging, climbing stairs and descending stairs. EMG and IMU signals were synchronized, standardized, and segmented using 75%-overlapping windows. In the implemented pipeline, feature standardization preceded segmentation, after which the windows were randomly divided into 70% training and 30% testing subsets without participant- or trial-level grouping. Consequently, overlapping windows, including windows from the same participant and trial, could occur in both subsets. Under this window-level protocol, attention-enhanced CNN-LSTM models recorded approximately 98-99% accuracy on ENABL3S and approximately 99% on SDALLE. These values are protocol-specific and may be optimistic; they do not measure generalization to unseen participants or establish a portable model ranking. GAN augmentation increased the SDALLE row count by approximately 12% and changed average testing accuracy from 96.9% before augmentation to 96.5% afterward under the implemented protocol. The study therefore provides a dataset resource and an exploratory subject-dependent comparison of predictive and computational behavior. Participant-independent evaluation with training-fold-only normalization, model selection, and GAN training is required before drawing conclusions about cross-subject robustness or deployment readiness.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-64847-4
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.