MARATTO

article · Intelligent Data Analysis

A multi-step approach to evaluating the effect of temperature and humidity on accuracy of solar energy prediction using hybrid DTCN-LSTM

Abstract

Accurate solar energy prediction is critical for optimising renewable energy systems, particularly in regions with diverse climatic conditions. This study investigates the impact of humidity and temperature on solar energy prediction accuracy in Ghanaian climates. It uses a hybrid Dilated Temporal Convolutional Network and Long Short-Term Memory (DTCN-LSTM) model to capture diurnal patterns and normalised temperature, humidity, and solar irradiance data from 2010–2022. The results show exceptional predictive accuracy, with R 2 values exceeding 99.86 and near-zero RMSE values of less than 0.0055 kWh across all areas studied, representing 0.098 percent of the designed 560Wh of the solar energy simulated. Temperature exclusion caused the largest performance decline, while humidity exclusion had negligible beneficial effects. The DTCN-LSTM model exhibited strong generalisation, with minimal training-testing discrepancies R 2 ≤ 0.07%, and maintained high R 2 accuracy of greater than 99.87% even when both temperature and humidity were excluded, highlighting its adaptability to sparse sensor environments. The findings show that prioritising temperature data collection over humidity improves solar energy prediction accuracy, and the DTCN-LSTM robustness across diverse climates is a vital tool for enhancing grid stability and energy storage planning in variable environments. This work further advances adaptive machine learning frameworks for renewable energy systems, emphasising scalability and operational practicality in global solar forecasting applications.

Research topics

  • Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
  • Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
  • Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1177/1088467x251346480

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.