MARATTO

article · Malaria Journal

A maximal-coverage approach to prioritizing newborn sickle cell screening sites in Uganda using a sickle cell-malaria co-risk surface

2026Open accessMakerere University

Abstract

Using a HbS-PfPR<sub>2-10</sub> co-risk surface and a maximal-coverage approach yielded 50 ranked candidate hub locations for newborn sickle cell screening programmes that capture 65.6 percent of baseline co-risk with 28 candidate hubs able to operationalize screening within the existing public health facility infrastructure. The ranked hub list, coverage curve, and district equity summaries offer the Uganda Ministry of Health and partners a transparent way to phase expansion of newborn sickle cell screening and to align new hubs with malaria control activities in the highest-burden districts.

Research topics

  • Malaria Research and Control
  • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Mosquito-borne diseases and control

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s12936-026-05846-8

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.