MARATTO

article · Journal Of Big Data

A hybrid Hadoop-based sentiment analysis classifier for tweets associated with COVID-19 utilizing two machine learning algorithms: CNN, and fuzzy C4.5

20244 citationsOpen accessUniversité Sultan Moulay Slimane

Abstract

In recent years, research on opinion mining from X (formerly Twitter) has rapidly advanced, focusing on processing tweets to determine user sentiments about events. Many researchers prefer using machine and deep learning techniques for this analysis. This work proposes a novel approach integrating the C4.5 procedure, fuzzy rule patterns, and convolutional neural networks. The approach involves six steps: pre-processing to remove noisy data, vectorizing tweets with word embedding, extracting sentiment and contextual features using convolutional neural networks, fuzzifying outputs with a Gaussian fuzzifier to handle ambiguity, constructing a fuzzy tree and rule base using a fuzzy version of C4.5, and classifying tweets with fuzzy General Reasoning. This method combines the benefits of convolutional neural networks and C4.5 while addressing imprecise data with fuzzy logic. Implemented on a Hadoop framework-based cluster with five computing units, the approach was extensively tested. The results showed that the model performs exceptionally well on the COVID-19_Sentiments dataset, surpassing other classification algorithms with a precision rate of 94.56%, false-negative rate of 5.28%, classification rate of 95.15%, F1-score of 94.63%, kappa statistic of 95.12%, execution time of 11.81 s, false-positive rate of 4.26%, error rate of 4.26%, specificity of 95.74%, recall of 94.72%, stability with a mean deviation standard of 0.09%, convergence starting around the 75th round, and significantly reduced complexity in terms of time and space.

Research topics

  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s40537-024-01014-4

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.