MARATTO

article · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence

A Framework for TQM to Achieve Business Excellence

200690 citationsMansoura University

In plain language

An analysis of total quality management synthesises the work of prominent thinkers into a framework based on technology, organisation, and people. These core operational dimensions link directly to business performance through balanced scorecard financial and non-financial metrics. An empirical survey of European enterprises reveals that organisations face substantial difficulty when translating quality management theories into day-to-day operations. Very few firms achieve a genuinely holistic adoption, and those that do typically focus heavily on technical systems while overlooking softer operational issues. Consequently, while companies can realise direct financial outputs, they regularly miss out on vital non-financial gains, including workflow management, staff skill development, and team learning. Non-financial metrics also receive consistently lower priority compared to standard financial measures, highlighting a persistent imbalance in implementation programmes across the corporate sector.

Key takeaways

  • Translating total quality management theory into practical execution remains a major challenge for most enterprises.
  • Firms tend to overemphasise technological components while neglecting human and organisational aspects of quality management.
  • Organisations frequently attain financial returns from quality initiatives but fail to achieve non-financial benefits such as workflow efficiency and team learning.
  • Corporate performance assessments continue to assign lower weightings to non-financial indicators compared to financial metrics.
  • A balanced framework grouping enablers into technology, organisation, and people helps guide more holistic operational improvements.

Why it matters

Total quality management is widely seen as critical for operational success, yet firms often struggle to embed it effectively. Over-prioritising technical tools and immediate financial metrics leads businesses to neglect workforce skills and continuous learning. Understanding these imbalances allows managers, advisers, and investors to build more resilient corporate processes that deliver sustainable internal development alongside standard financial performance.

Commercialisation angle

The framework provides an applied diagnostic approach for corporate leaders, operations managers, and management consultants seeking to benchmark and guide quality management practices. Based on survey data from European firms, the work represents an applied operational model rather than a deployable software product. It can directly inform executive training programmes, operational audits, and performance measurement designs to help companies balance technological investments with workforce learning.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Abstract This paper provides an analysis of the essential characteristics of the TQM philosophy by comparing the work of ten notable authors in the field. A framework is produced which clusters the identified TQM enablers under the well-known operations management dimensions of technology, organisation and people. These enablers are linked with business performance via balance scorecard type financial and non-financial measures. In order to capture a snapshot of European Company's efforts to implement the TQM, a questionnaire survey is designed and implemented. Results of the survey are presented showing the main differentiating factors between the sample companies, and a way of assessing the difference between the theoretical underpinning and the practitioners' undertakings. Survey results indicate that organisations are experiencing much difficulty in translating total quality management theory into practice. Only a few organisations have successfully adopted a holistic approach to total quality management philosophy, and most of these put relatively high emphasis on technology elements compared with soft issues of TQM. However, where companies can realise the financial outputs, non-financial benefits such as workflow management, skills development and team learning are not realised. In addition, overall, non-financial measures have secured low weightings compared with the financial measures. We believe that the framework presented in this paper can help an organisation to concentrate its TQM implementation efforts in terms of technology, organisational and people management dimensions.

Research topics

  • Quality and Supply Management
  • Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Accounting and Organizational Management

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/14783360600750485

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.