article
This paper proposes a dual-band GNSS antenna featuring a broad axial ratio beamwidth and a straightforward design, optimized for operation in the L2 and L5 GNSS frequency bands. Firstly, an upper rectangular patch, fed by a probe and positioned at a pre-calculated point, is utilized to excite the two orthogonal modes <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$TM_{10}$</tex> and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$TM_{01}$</tex> at L2 and L5 bands. Secondly, a lower stacked V-slotted patch antenna, with an optimized offset shift relative to the upper patch, is employed to fine-tune the operating bands and improve the axial ratio beamwidth (ARBW) at both L2 and L5 bands. Lastly, an irregular slit of optimal size and position is etched in the upper patch to further enhance the ARBW. The proposed antenna shows low reflection coefficient values at 1.17-1.256 GHz for (L2/L5) bands with right-hand circular polarization (RHCP) operation. The ARBWs at two orthogonal cut-planes are <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{250}/\mathbf{203.5}^{\circ}$</tex> and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{231}/ \mathbf{202}^{\circ}$</tex>, with gains of 3.5, and 5.8 dBic at L5, and L2, respectively.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1109/niles63360.2024.10753263
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.