MARATTO

article · FUDMA Journal of Sciences

A DECENTRALIZED CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION SYSTEM LEVERAGING BLOCKCHAIN AND NON-FUNGIBLE TOKENS

2026Open accessBenue State University

Abstract

Academic certificate verification in many institutions is still carried out using centralized and manual systems, which are prone to forgery, data manipulation, high administrative costs, and delays in verification. These challenges reduce the reliability and efficiency of credential validation. This research work focuses on the development of a Decentralized Certificate Verification System (DCVS) that improves security, transparency, and trust in academic credential verification. The proposed system uses blockchain technology to represent academic certificates as Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) based on the ERC-721 standard deployed on the Polygon blockchain. Certificate documents and metadata are stored off-chain using the Interplanetary File System (IPFS), while cryptographic references are recorded on the blockchain to ensure data integrity and prevent tampering. The system adopts Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) principles, allowing students to own and share their credentials while enabling employers and institutions to verify certificates without relying on a central authority. Evaluation of the system on the Polygon test network showed a reliable result with a minting confirmation time of 3.2 seconds, less than the 10-second standard benchmark, verification latency of 0.8 seconds, less than the 2-second benchmark, and a transaction cost of 0.00021 MATIC, less than the 0.01 MATIC standard cost. The study demonstrates that blockchain-based solutions can effectively address the challenges of traditional academic certificate verification systems.

Research topics

  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
  • Academic integrity and plagiarism

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.33003/fjs-2026-1006-5064

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.