article · World Journal of Epidemiology
Introduction: Cholera remains a major public health challenge in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), which is classified as being in an acute crisis situation . This study evaluates the quality of the response in Lubumbashi by examining the organization of treatment centers (TCCs), waste management, and diagnostic performance . Methodology: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted by 129 investigators in the affected health zones . The assessment focused on biosafety compliance (one-way circuit), logistical resources, and the effectiveness of Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) . Data were analyzed using logistic regression models to identify predictors of compliance . Results: The study reveals that awareness-raising and basic sanitation (29%) are the most frequent activities . The rapid diagnostic test (RDT) demonstrated excellent sensitivity (95.4%) and a positive predictive value of 95.6%, confirming its effectiveness as a rapid screening tool . However, critical gaps remain: 64% of facilities use waste pits for sharps instead of incinerators . Multivariate analysis identifies 24/7 access to electricity as the major independent predictor of biosafety circuit compliance (ORa = 48.1; p = 0.002) . An electrified facility is 48 times more likely to meet protection standards than a facility without a stable power supply . Conclusion: Despite good case detection capacity, the cholera response in Lubumbashi suffers from structural vulnerabilities related to energy deficits and precarious waste management . To achieve the cholera elimination target by 2027, it is imperative to prioritize energy self-sufficiency for cholera treatment centers (solar or generators) and to modernize biosecurity infrastructure . The transition from a purely medical response to a technological upgrade is essential to break the epidemic cycle. Keywords: Cholera, Epidemic response, Biosecurity, Lubumbashi.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.52338/wjoep.2026.5454
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.