MARATTO

article · Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise

A Comparison of the Physical Characteristics of Adolescent Female, Academy Cricket Players

20243 citationsOpen accessRhodes University

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Women’s cricket has grown in popularity over the last decade, however despite this there is a paucity of literature examining the female version of the game. Furthermore, no research has examined the physical attributes of female cricketers, particularly adolescents. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to develop a physical profile for u/11, u/13, u15, and u/18 female adolescent cricket players. Methods One hundred and five (age: 13.00 ± 2.37 years, stature: 156.91 ± 12.06 cm, mass: 50.85 ± 10.40 kg) female academy players were profiled for body composition, flexibility, lower and upper body power, sprint speed, and change of direction ability. Results Both the u/11 and u/13 age groups differed significantly ( P < 0.05) to each other and the u/15 and u/18 age groups for stature, lower and upper limb power, and change of direction time. No significant differences ( P < 0.05) were observed for all tests between the u/15 and u/18 age groups. Conclusion The findings of this investigation provide normative data for adolescent female cricketers that can be used by strength and conditioning coaches for the implementation of scientifically based training programs, as well as to set goals to identify progression in physical ability during maturation and training. Additionally, the study is relevant for coaches working within the age group to support their own learning and development within the applied nature of coaching and support of their female athletes.

Research topics

  • Sports Performance and Training
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s42978-024-00318-4

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.