article
The main aim of the study is to compare both statistical and machine learning algorithms in survival analysis prediction, taking into account the dimensionality of the dataset. Performance criteria like the concordance-censored index have been employed in the context of 5-fold and 10-fold cross-validation. The dataset utilized was the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI). Two machine-learning algorithms (eXtreme Gradient Boosting and Fast Survival Support Vector Machine) and one statistical technique (Cox proportional hazard model) were employed. The results showed through the application that, as features utilized increase, XGBoost surpasses other algorithms. However, as the number of selected features decreases drastically, the statistical analysis and the Fast Survival Support Vector Machine are both better at survival prediction.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1109/niles63360.2024.10753226
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.