MARATTO

article · South African Dental Journal

A Comparative Analysis of Traditional Dental Screening versus Smart Phone Screening

Abstract

Teledentistry has emerged as a promising solution to address oral health disparities, particularly in resource-limited settingslike rural South Africa, where low dentist-to-population ratios and high costs restrict access to dental care. The present study evaluated the reliability and accuracy of smartphonebased, remote dental screening compared to traditional chairside clinical examination screening. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 145 participants (≥18 years) attending the Tygerberg Oral Health Centre. Standardized intraoral photographs were captured using an Apple iPhone XS and uploaded securely to the Vula App for remoteassessment. Diagnostic tools, including the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) and the Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth (DMFT) index, were employed to ensure consistency.

Research topics

  • Dental Research and COVID-19
  • Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.17159/sadj.v80i10.21030

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.