article · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Abstract Background and Aims Renally adjusted lamivudine dosages are effective. However, some of the kidney failure patients managed with lamivudine-containing regimens are failing to suppress HIV in peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) effluent. The steady-state lamivudine pharmacokinetics among these patients was evaluated. Method This overnight open-label pharmacokinetic study enrolled participants living with HIV and managed with CAPD. Lamivudine levels in blood serum and CAPD effluent samples were quantified using liquid chromatography coupled with a mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic measures were obtained through non-compartmental analysis. Results Twenty-eight participants were recruited with a median ARV duration of 8 (IQR, 4.5-10.5) years and a CAPD duration of 13.3 (IQR, 3.3-31.9) months. The majority, 78.6% (22/20) of participants received a 50 mg dose and 25% (1/4) had a detectable HIV viral load (HIV-VL) in CAPD, while 10.7% (3/28), and another 10.7% (3/28) received 75 mg and 300 mg dosages, respectively. Among those treated with 75 and 300 mg, 50% (2/4) and 25% (1/4) had detectable HIV-VL in CAPD, respectively. The peritoneal membrane characteristics and CAPD system strengths were variable across the entire study population. Lamivudine exposure was increased in blood serum (50 mg-AUC0-24 hours, 651.3 ng/mL; 75 mg-AUC0-24 hours, 677.84 ng/mL; 300 mg-AUC0-24 hours, 3135.89 ng/mL) compared to CAPD effluents (50 mg-AUC0-24 hours, 384.91 ng/mL; 75 mg-AUC0-24 hours, 383.24 ng/mL; 300 mg-AUC0-24 hours, 2001.60 ng/mL) among the entire study population. The Cmax (50 mg, 41.5 ng/mL; 75 mg, 53.2 ng/mL; 300 mg, 199.1 ng/mL) and Cmin (50 mg, 17.8 ng/mL; 75 mg, 16.4 ng/mL; 300 mg, 76.4 ng/mL) measured in serum were within the therapeutic levels. Conclusion Steady-state lamivudine pharmacokinetic measures were variable among the entire study population; however, the total lamivudine exposure was within the therapeutic levels.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfae069.1654
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.